Matthew Kidd > Comments
|
Oct 17, 2020
This trail is very popular with trial runners.
View Comment
|
|
May 8, 2020
This is a typical 3-star San Diego county hike. It can't hold a candle to southern Utah, Colorado, the Sier…
View Comment
|
|
Jul 8, 2019
View this photo full size to fully appreciate it.
View Comment
|
|
May 26, 2019
The park guide has this as an 8.6 mile loop. My GPS track came in at 9.92 miles but this dropped to 9.52 mi…
View Comment
|
|
May 16, 2019
The scenic payoff is really great for such an easy hike. We started about 4 pm when it was cooling off and…
View Comment
|
|
Jun 20, 2018
Nice flow.
View Comment
|
|
Jun 20, 2018
David, 1983 was before my hiking days but a memorably wet year. Check out Kevin Fedarko's The Emerald Mile:…
View Comment
|
|
May 4, 2018
Nice sky. Looks great at full resolution.
View Comment
|
|
Apr 9, 2018
Another great photo murdered by a smartphone camera.
View Comment
|
|
Feb 17, 2018
Best to start early if the weather is nice and aim to be back by 1 pm during the high season. This way you'…
View Comment
|
|
Feb 17, 2018
I am the one who bounces.
View Comment
|
|
Jul 22, 2017
As usual these excessively vertical photos would benefit from a 4:3 crop, losing from the bottom in this case.
View Comment
|
|
Jul 22, 2017
This photo would gain from a 4:3 crop, losing from the top to make the hiker more prominent.
View Comment
|
|
Jul 22, 2017
Nice, but I think it gains some from a 3:2 (or even 16:9) crop, losing a little from the top and more from…
View Comment
|
|
Jul 18, 2017
Crop this one 4:3 for a better result.
View Comment
|
|
Jul 18, 2017
I'm giving this 3 stars, going with the consensus but if it were sharper, I'd give it 4 stars. The photo wa…
View Comment
|
|
Jul 18, 2017
Level the horizon! The subject deserves better handling.
View Comment
|
|
Jul 18, 2017
This is way over-processed, apparently by Instagram filters based on what's in the EXIF tag. It would be a…
View Comment
|
|
Jul 17, 2017
Crop a bit off the top to make the subject stand out more.
View Comment
|
|
Jul 8, 2017
Crop is a bit too tight but it's close to a 4-star photo.
View Comment
|
|
Jul 8, 2017
This is a nice photo but would benefit from including more of the sky for a balanced less claustrophobic fe…
View Comment
|
|
Jul 8, 2017
Nothing is in focus!
View Comment
|
|
Jul 7, 2017
Nothing is in focus!
View Comment
|
|
Jul 7, 2017
There is a pleasing geometry to this photo.
View Comment
|
|
Jul 7, 2017
This scene deserved a better camera. Nothing is in focus, the saturation appears to have been punched up, a…
View Comment
|
|
Jul 7, 2017
Cropping some of the bottom and left, keeping the 4:3 aspect ratio, would improve this photo.
View Comment
|
|
Jul 7, 2017
Stitching failure. Source material deserved better.
View Comment
|
|
Jul 5, 2017
Nice use of depth of field
View Comment
|
|
Jul 2, 2017
A macro shot... of what?! Shallow depth of field can create great pictures but the subject in focus needs t…
View Comment
|
|
Jul 2, 2017
Please level the horizon.
View Comment
|
|
Jun 28, 2017
This picture works better cropped 4:3
View Comment
|
|
Jun 28, 2017
The nearly 2:1 vertical aspect ratio does not work well.
View Comment
|
|
Jun 28, 2017
This is nice picture but I think it works better if cropped to a 4:3 aspect ratio instead of the original 3…
View Comment
|
|
Jun 28, 2017
Good subject but the aspect ratio is awkward and the horizon isn't leveled.
View Comment
|
|
Jun 28, 2017
What a crazy ski!
View Comment
|
|
Jun 28, 2017
This is nice but cropped too tight vertically. It's better to stitch these panoramas in Photoshop from seve…
View Comment
|


