Clarity on difficulty (danger) ratings


Original Post
Russell Hobart · Apr 5, 2017 · Chapel Hill, NC · Joined Jul 2014 · Points: 1,652

I recently hiked Munra Point (https://www.hikingproject.com/trail/7018666) and discovered what I think is a problem. The Munra Point hike is rated as a intermediate hike while in my professional opinion (sorry- this sounds like typical internet BS, but you can google me to see if I'm legit) is that it is at least third class scrambling in the Yosemite Decimal System. I assume the user who entered route, gave it this rating because it's only a mile long. So the problem is that if hikes are rated on commitment (how long they are and how long it takes to do them) then it could put intermediate hiker in over their head very quickly. If that's not how their rated (which I think is supposed to be the case) then greater editorial control should be made by the HP staff. What do you all think?


Mikhaila Redovian · Apr 5, 2017 · Unknown Hometown · Joined Jul 2015 · Points: 7,688

Hey Russell, 

Thanks for reaching out with a great question! If you're looking at that page, you'll notice that you can share your opinion on each and every trail. This includes star ratings, and difficulty ratings. Just below the photo reel, there is a box asking you to Rate this Trail. You're given the option to add a star opinion, share the route on social media, and finally give the route a difficulty rating. When a contributor adds a trail initially, they are asked to provide their own difficulty rating. This is a bit of a grey area, but most of the time our contributors provide what they feel is an accurate assessment on the difficulty of the route. To mitigate one person's opinion, we provide tools for the general public to weigh in on what the initial contributor added. For example, a hiker living in Boulder might find the ascent of Mt. Bierstadt to be easy/intermediate, because that hiker is living at altitude, and has hiked many more difficult trails. However, a visitor coming from sea level might have a more difficult time on the trail, and they can add their own rating to that trail. After a bit of time, these ratings will average out. 

Because our Content team relies on contributor submissions, it's unlikely that we will have hiked a specific trail and would be able to weigh in on the route. We think that giving the hikers of Hiking Project the power to add their opinions is a more powerful and accurate way to come to a consensus. 

I think that in cases like this, the most effective way to spread that word about the difficulty of this trail would be to rate it as a double black diamond (very difficult) and perhaps add a note in the comment section. Let me know your thoughts! 

Mikhaila 


Guideline #1: Don't be a jerk.

Post a Reply

Log In to Reply